COMMUN POTTERY IN
FROM THE END OF THE FIFTH
TO THE MIDDLE OF THE SEVENTH
CENTURIES AD
Summary
Introduction
This
work is devoted to research on the coarse (everyday) pottery of the
Ipotești-Cândești Culture of Walachia (southern Romania)[1], on the plain north of the lower Danube from the late
fifth to middle of the seventh centuries. The study of the complex history of
the area is aided by the existence of a East Roman and Byzantine written
sources, but one of the main sources of evidence is that produced by
archaeology, and the pottery assemblages studied here form an important feature
of this archaeological material.
The
work is organized in three volumes: the main text (I), the appendices (II) and
the illustrations (III). The main text volume comprises five sections:
technological system (I), referential system (II), a discussion of the main
sites for the Ipotești-Cândești culture (III), a description of Ipotești-Cândești
pottery (IV) and the circumstances (V). The volume also contains an
Introduction and the Conclusions. The second volume is more substantial and contains
technical material (definitions of terms, the techniques used for measurements
or calculations section I), extracts from the pottery database with
statistical overviews (sections II-V), commentaries on the historical sources
(section VI). It forms a backup for the arguments of the main text, making it
clearer and shorter.
Beyond
the chronological and cultural limits imposed by the subject, the main goal is
the reconstruction of research methods in pottery studies in the region,
rejecting the subjective description (as well profiled rim, developed
shoulder) in favour of objective measurement, recording and computer-aid data
interpretation.
After
a short historical summary of archaeological research of the Justinian Age in
the
further Section I
back to the Summary index
the
Romanian version general index
the
Romanian version for Introduction
back to the National Museum Publications
back to the National Museum index
[1] The
Romanian title (which is that official for the PhD) is referring only to
Muntenia, because in the mid 1990s the data for Oltenia was extremely poor.
When the study was going to be completed, Oltenia (western